'Ponking' ban considered after Iggle injury
Tuesday, July 26, 2011
Residents who elect to ride the Pinky-Ponk around the night garden may soon have a smoother ride as the night garden council considers a proposal to ban 'Ponking'. The move comes after ubiquitous garden visitor Iggle Piggle reportedly suffered an injury from falling over during a large Ponk. Piggle, who was unable to discuss his injury because of an impending lawsuit, was travelling in the company of Upsy Daisy and the Tombliboos when the Pinky-Ponk hit a tree.
'Ponk alarm adequate'
Upsy Daisy, a long-term friend of Iggle Piggle, is spearheading the anti-Ponk campaign in the night garden. 'We need to put an end to Ponking. It looks like fun, but it is potentially hazardous, as Iggle's injuries confirm', she stated.
Representatives of Pinky-Ponk Inc have responded to claims that their transport is dangerous by pointing out that a proximity alarm is triggered in order to warn travellers that a Ponk is imminent, allowing them time to prepare. 'The Ponk alarm gives adequate warning for customers', said one. 'There is a light and sound component so that even hearing impaired customers are warned. We really don't see how we could make the Pinky-Ponk any safer'.
Upsy Daisy and others in the anti-Ponk camp are not convinced. 'What is the point of the warning if there are no seatbelts and nothing to hold on to?' questioned Upsy.
Ponking 'just good fun'
Ponk enthusiasts are outraged by the proposal to ban their favourite sport, which is unique to the night garden. One enthusiastic Ponker argued, 'Ponking makes otherwise boring journey on the Pinky-Ponk fun! What else are we supposed to do, wave at one another?' Another Ponker, who wished to remain anonymous, suggested that Iggle Piggle may have been injured because of an inherent problem with balance, and not because of the Ponk. 'Iggle Piggle falls over at the drop of a hat, not just in the Pinky Ponk', our informant stated.